A further thought. The update policy for SnmpAuthProtocols is Standards Track, so at present this I-D - Informational - will not do.
And while an Individual Submission can be Standards Track, ADs often prefer it to be a WG I-D. Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Melinda Shore" <[email protected]> To: "Johannes Merkle" <[email protected]> Cc: "Manfred Lochter" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 6:47 PM > On 3/24/14 4:35 AM, Johannes Merkle wrote: > > a while ago, I had announced a draft on a new USM authentication protocol HMAC-SHA-256-128 for use in SNMP. Following > > Uri's suggestion (and with his valuable support) I have considerably extended the draft: > > - Further SHA-2 based HMAC authentication protocols have been included to provide ore flexibility. > > - A (short) section explains how to perform key change and key localization with these protocols > > - A MIB definition has been added. > > > Is there interest in adoption of this draft by the WG? > > Hi, Johannes: > > We're trying to make sure that documents get adequate review > before adoption by the working group, so before we put out a > call for adoption we're going to try to get feedback from > someone who can provide cryptographic review and someone on > the snmp side. We'll start that process moving. > > Melinda _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
