Another try to gather some feedback. Some people have already expressed their 
support for adopting the draft and have
provided feedback to previous version, so I put them on cc. Please indicate, if 
you see any issues.

Johannes


Johannes Merkle wrote on 26.05.2014 11:21:
> so far, there has been no feedback on the new version, but the discussion on 
> the previous one indicated considerable
> interest. Does the silence indicate "no objections" or are there still issues?
> 
> Should the draft be adopted by the WG?
> 
> Johannes
> 
> Johannes Merkle wrote on 06.05.2014 12:56:
>> Hi,
>>
>> after a fruitful discussion on the first version 
>> (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg/current/msg03022.html), we
>> have updated draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp.
>>
>> Major changes are:
>>
>> - Protocol names unified to usmHMACXXXSHAYYYAuthProtocol.
>>
>> - Definition of mandatory (usmHMAC192SHA256AuthProtocol) and recommended 
>> (usmHMAC256SHA512AuthProtocol) protocols.
>> (I just noticed that the abstract and introduction still talk about "new 
>> optional authentication protocols"; this is an
>> error I will fix in the next revision)
>>
>> - Key word reference (RFC 2119) added
>>
>> - MIB biolerplate added (Sections on The Internet-Standard Management 
>> Framework, Structure of the MIB Module,
>> Relationship to Other MIB Modules)
>>
>> - Security Considerations considerably extended (guidance on cryptographic 
>> strength, key derivation from passwords,
>> access to MIB)
>>
>> - IANA considerations clarified and comments for RFC Ed in MIB definition 
>> added
>>
>> Comments are welcome. There was considerable interest in adoption by the WG, 
>> so please stand up if you have issues.
>>
>> Johannes
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Betreff: New Version Notification for draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-01.txt
>> Datum: Tue, 6 May 2014 02:38:29 -0700
>> Von: <[email protected]>
>> An: Johannes Merkle <[email protected]>, Manfred Lochter 
>> <[email protected]>, Manfred Lochter
>> <[email protected]>, Johannes Merkle <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>> A new version of I-D, draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-01.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Johannes Merkle and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>>
>> Name:                draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp
>> Revision:    01
>> Title:               HMAC-SHA-2 Authentication Protocols in USM for SNMP
>> Document date:       2014-05-06
>> Group:               Individual Submission
>> Pages:               14
>> URL:            
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-01.txt
>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/
>> Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-01
>> Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-01
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    This memo specifies new optional HMAC-SHA-2 authentication protocols
>>    for the User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3 defined in RFC
>>    3414.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
> 
> 


-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Dr. Johannes Merkle
Principal Beratung, Elektronische Identitäten
Public Sector
secunet Security Networks AG
Mergenthaler Allee 77
65760 Eschborn
Germany
Telefon +49 201 54 54-3091
Telefax +49 201 54 54-1325
Mobil   +49 175 2224439
[email protected]
www.secunet.com

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to