Hi, Greg: Thanks for comments on SFC related cases in the problem statement draft.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ww-opsawg-multi-layer-oam-01 See my reply inline below. Greg>Service may be in form of NF instantiated in a cloud/data center. I think that in such case there would not be physical node to point to. [Qin]:Yes, service node can be either physical node or virtual node. Do you have any proposed change here? Greg> For the purpose of SFC OAM location of SF is irrelevant. Location of SF is OAM information of the lower layer than SFC OAM. [Qin]:Correct, for SFC OAM, SF location doesn’t matter, what matter is where OAM information is located and where OAM function is performed. Any proposed change here?
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
