On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 04:34:19PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote: >> >> Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to >> draft-ietf-opsawg-coman-probstate-reqs-02 or >> draft-ietf-opsawg-coman-use-cases? If so, has this IPR been disclosed >> in compliance with IETF IPR rules? >> (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.) >> >> If you are a document author or listed contributor on this document, >> please reply to this email regardless of whether or not you are >> personally aware of any relevant IPR. We might not be able to advance >> this document to the next stage until we have received a reply from >> each author and listed contributor. > > I am not sure whether this is a reasonable question to ask for use > cases and requirements documents
Yeah, I hear you, but I've learnt that it is easier / safer to just ask for *all* documents. I once had an issue where we adopted a document, and then, just at WGLC the author suddenly popped up and said that they had IPR, and that he'd "never heard of this having to disclose IPR thing". This made for a fun few weeks - now I ask early and often :-) It would be unfortunate to adopt a requirements document and then only later discover that the only realistic way to meet one of the requirements is to use IPR that is owned by one of the authors. > but in order to not complicate the > process, let me declare that I am personally not aware of IPR that > needs to be disclosed. Thank you. W > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
