On 16 Jul 2014, at 17:29, Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Michael,
> 
> You wrote:
> 
>   One of the most accepted packet interchange
>   formats is the one defined by libpcap, which is rather old and is
>   lacking in functionality for more modern applications particularly
>   from the extensibility point of view.
> 
> Can you please expand.
Sure.

Every pcap file starts with a file header, which contains information
about the version, byte ordering, timestamp, snap length and the link
layer type of all packets. After the file header you have a sequence
of records. Every packet starts with a record header containing the
time and the length of the the record followed by the actual bytes of
the packet.

A pcapng file consists of a sequence of blocks. Each block has a length
field and a type field. This allows you to add additional blocks in the
future. A reader can also skip blocks he doesn't know. This gives you
extensibility. The blocks currently defined allow you to store more
information than a classical pcap file:
* You can store packets from different interfaces with different link
  layers.
* You can store information about packet drops between captured packets
  (like snoop).
* You can store statistical information about drop numbers during the capture
* You can store information about DNS names of node you capture traffic from.

Best regards
Michael
> 
> Regards, Benoit
>> On 26 Jun 2014, at 19:29, Michael Tuexen <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear all,
>>> 
>>> I have submitted an ID describing the default packet format format
>>> used by Wireshark for saving capture files:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-tuexen-opswg-pcapng-00.txt
>> Wrong name... Use
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng-00.txt
>>> Is there any interest in the WG to work on this and improve it?
>>> 
>>> Any comments are welcome!
>>> 
>>> Best regards
>>> Michael
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OPSAWG mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPSAWG mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to