Dear all:

On coman use cases 02

Really excellent work! Fits my own understanding in every scenario I am 
familiar with.

Issues:

The security section is absent yet security concerns are correctly discussed 
throughout. As it goes, security concerns for management flows are correctly 
expressed but often apply to many other use cases where the question is not 
discussed. Maybe a table in the security section could summarize case by case 
who manages the network and the devices, and what kind of security is in place.

There is a great discussion on light bulbs commissioning in the building 
section. I was actually missing that same discussion in the factory automation 
section.

Who manages the network during the factory setup/commissioning? Specific 
threats are associated to the transition to operational/trusted, and the 
process of handover exists in multiple scenarios.

Thanks again for this great document. Really useful, and I support its 
publication.

Pascal

Le 8 août 2014 à 20:10, "Raghuram Sudhaakar (rsudhaak)" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :

Dear ML users,
I read both the documents your mentioned below. Both are well written and 
address their scope quite well.
Only a few minor typos here and there.

On a general note, both these documents do not address the actual management 
protocol. It seems to me that these documents will typically be referenced by 
some other drafts (like our draft-ietf-6tisch-coap) that specify the protocol.


-raghuram

From: Thomas Watteyne 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2014 at 11:15 PM
To: raghuram sudhaakar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Fwd: [6lo] Fwd: [OPSAWG] Coman Drafts v02

Raghuram,
These drafts, which introduce the use cases and problem statement for 
constrained management, are very related to the CoAP draft you co-authored. I 
believe it would be very useful if you could review them and submit your review 
to the OPSAWG ML, as detailed below. Would that be possible?
Thomas

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Thomas Watteyne 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:32 PM
Subject: Fwd: [6lo] Fwd: [OPSAWG] Coman Drafts v02
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>


All,

The OPSWAG chairs have kindly agreed to extend the WGLC period for the 
following drafts [1] to August 11:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-coman-use-cases-02
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-coman-probstate-reqs-01

Pascal and myself believe those two drafts to be important for the ongoing work 
on managing a 6TiSCH network, and directly in line with e.g. 
draft-ietf-6tisch-coap. We therefore ask authors of draft-ietf-6tisch-coap, 
draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-interface, and any other 6TiSCH WG member to send 
reviews of this document to OPSAWG ML [2].

Thomas

[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tisch/current/msg02465.html
[2] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Warren Kumari <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: [coman] FW: [OPSAWG] Coman Drafts v02
To: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>


Hi all.

With apologies to the authors...

The chairs of 6LoWPAN and 6TSCH have asked if we can delay the end of
this WGLC so that their communities can review and comment on these 2
documents.

As we have not received very much feedback, this seems relevant to
their WGs, and they asked nicely, we have decided to extend the
deadline to August 11th.

Now, many folk will be traveling back to their homes over the next few
days - this probably means a few, or many hours on an airplane. May I
suggest copying these documents on your computer or reading device of
choice and reviewing the documents on the way home?

Thanks,
W

_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo


_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to