Warren, This has been a constructive process, thank you for agreeing to extend the WGLC period. Thomas
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi there all, > > Scott and myself chatted about these documents yesterday. > > Constrained networks and devices is not the core focus of this WG, and > so getting review and feedback on the documents has been somewhat > tricky. During IETF90 Thomas Watteyne asked for the WGLC to be > extended so that 6Lo and 6TiSCH could review and provide comments -- > and we got a significant amount of feedback from these groups. > > We have reviewed this feedback, and, while the reviews suggest some > changes and additions, we find there to be consensus for publishing > the document. > We are requesting the authors to incorporate the suggestions / > changes, confirm with the reviewers that their comments are addressed, > and then will give the WG one last, short opportunity to comment, and > then send it over to the IESG. > > Thank you everyone who commented and provided feedback, > Warren (as OpsAWG chair) >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
