Hi authors,

Regarding: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib/

Ian as allowed me to forward you his comments on the draft.

Cheers,
Mike MacFaden


From: Ian West <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Mail regarding draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib
Date: September 16, 2014 at 3:18:08 AM PDT
To: 'Michael MacFaden' <[email protected]>

 
Overall I think it looks great.
 
It would be really nice to have IO service times as well, ie something like 
accumulated milliseconds of wait time for io servicing,
this might be a harder to instrument. A counter64 of cumulative ms (us?) 
awaiting delivery is a really handy read/write latency metric.
 
The cputime and memory figures look good.
 
I am thinking there would be a storage object for the swap space which would 
give most of the paging stats if actual byte counts were added ?
 
Links back to the ifindex should also tie into vswitch I think ? My current 
walks of vmware are nesting vswitch ports nicely so that’s
looking good. Network stats seem good already, its primarily the per vhost cpu 
usage and io stats that are weak from a real time
perspective, this MIB looks like it should cover it really well.
 
Is this intended to be a vsphere (central management) resource, or a per 
physical host (or both, which would be great) ?
 
If you were to query this from a vsphere central management host, I am thinking 
you might want to add to the vmtable an identifier
for the physical host that the vm is currently running on. This would make the 
table useful either standalone or  across a bunch of
physical hosts.
 
Ill think on it some more, this seems like a great step forward over whats 
there now already in VMware’s implementation.
 

The vmStorageEntry statistics while having read operation and write operation 
counters don't allow for measuring the volume of read and write traffic. It 
would be useful to include 64 bit counters for read and write octets.


_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to