Hail OpsAWG! My apologies for forwarding this so late. I do intend to ask the working group to adopt this as a WG item for continued discussion and documentation of the conclusions of that discussion. See you in the meeting this morning!
Cheers, ~Chris On 10/27/14, 8:46 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > >A new version of I-D, draft-opsawg-operators-ietf-00.txt >has been successfully submitted by Chris Grundemann and posted to the >IETF repository. > >Name: draft-opsawg-operators-ietf >Revision: 00 >Title: Operators and the IETF >Document date: 2014-10-28 >Group: Individual Submission >Pages: 23 >URL: >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-opsawg-operators-ietf-00.txt >Status: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-opsawg-operators-ietf/ >Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-opsawg-operators-ietf-00 > > >Abstract: > Internet Society has launched a new project to address the perceived > gap between Operators and the IETF. The objective of this project is > ultimately to facilitate communications between the operator > community and the IETF to help ensure that operational realities > inform the development of key standards. The first phase of this > project was a survey of the operator community that was conducted > over the first half of 2014. This I-D aims to synthesize the initial > survey results, along with information we collected directly from > operators during the survey window. The primary purpose of doing > this is to start a conversation which we hope will lead to increases > in the level of operational input and feedback to the IETF standards > making process. > > > > > > >Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >submission >until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > >The IETF Secretariat > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
