Tom,

please do not talk about a counter 'reset' or resetting a counter to
zero. This is not how SNMP counters work. Instead, make it clear for
every Counter what the discontinuity indicator is. See Section 7.1.6
of RFC 2578:

   Counters have no defined "initial" value, and thus, a single value of
   a Counter has (in general) no information content.  Discontinuities
   in the monotonically increasing value normally occur at re-
   initialization of the management system, and at other times as
   specified in the description of an object-type using this ASN.1 type.
   If such other times can occur, for example, the creation of an object
   instance at times other than re-initialization, then a corresponding
   object should be defined, with an appropriate SYNTAX clause, to
   indicate the last discontinuity.  Examples of appropriate SYNTAX
   clause include:  TimeStamp (a textual convention defined in [3]),
   DateAndTime (another textual convention from [3]) or TimeTicks.

The default discontinuity indicator is sysUpTime. If NAT instances can
come and go dynamically, you want to specify other discontinuity
indicators.

/js

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:24:23AM -0500, Tom Taylor wrote:
> Natv2-MIB has few writable objects, only for control of notifications 
> and setting of quotas. Thus the module assumes that other means are used 
> to provision NAT instances and address pools and configure subscriber 
> data. It seems likely that a mechanism such as the one used to maintain 
> the integrity of references to ifIndex will be needed to protect 
> references to NAT instance index, address pool index, and subscriber 
> index, but that is another topic.
> 
> The basic question is how persistent the counter values supported by the 
> Natv2-MIB should be. Apparently past practice has been to say: "until 
> the agent restarts", but that isn't really helpful when you are trying 
> to debug a problem. I distinguish between a counter, which is 
> cumulative, and a state object, which gives a snapshot at the moment of 
> reporting.
> 
> Would implementors support the following general statement?
> 
> "Ideally, counter values are never reset while the parent object (NAT 
> instance, address pool, subscriber) continues to exist, even across 
> reboots. Individual implementations may not be able to guarantee this 
> level of persistence, and SHOULD document the circumstances under which 
> resets could occur. In any event, all implementations MUST report the 
> time of last reset in the relevant object in the NAT instance, address 
> pool, and subscriber tables."
> 
> By "reset" I mean setting the counter back to zero. I think that is the 
> proper action, because it makes discontinuities more obvious than 
> resetting to a random value.
> 
> No comments mean that I will go ahead with this proposal.
> 
> Tom Taylor
> 
> 
> 
> BACKGROUND
> 
> In my present thinking, the conceptual tables in the MIB module come in 
> two groups, device level, and NAT instance level:
> 
> 1. Device level: indexed by subscriber index, not by instance index (to 
> make it easier to reassign subscribers from one NAT instance on the 
> device to another):
> 
> natv2SubscriberTable
>   -- contains per-subscriber counters
> natv2SubscriberIngressInterfaceClassifierTable
>   -- configuration data only
> 
> 2. Group indexed by NAT instance, meaningful only while the instance exists:
> 
> natv2InstanceTable
>   -- now incorporates the per-instance counters, thresholds, and
>      limits that were in separate tables before
> natv2NextProtocolTable
>   -- counters per protocol supported by the NAT instance
> natv2PoolTable
>   -- counters per address pool
> natv2PoolRangeTable
>   -- configuration data only
> natv2AddressMapTable
>   -- state data only
> natv2PortMapTable
>   -- state data only
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Behave mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to