Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-mibs-to-ieee80231-01: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mibs-to-ieee80231/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This strictly a DISCUSS to make sure I understand the process going forward. Will any of the RFCs listed in section 2 need to have their status changed to Historic? Can we mark an RFC as being obsoleted by an IEEE spec? _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
