Just to set the agenda: the definition of the address mapping table entry:

natv2AddressMapEntry OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX Natv2AddressMapEntry
    MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
    STATUS current
    DESCRIPTION
        "Mapping from internal to external address."
    INDEX { natv2AddressMapInstanceIndex,
            natv2AddressMapInternalRealm,
            natv2AddressMapInternalAddressType,
            natv2AddressMapInternalAddress }
    ::= { natv2AddressMapTable 1 }

Natv2AddressMapEntry ::=
    SEQUENCE {
        natv2AddressMapInstanceIndex       Natv2InstanceIndex,
        natv2AddressMapInternalRealm       SnmpAdminString,
        natv2AddressMapInternalAddressType InetAddressType,
        natv2AddressMapInternalAddress     InetAddress,
        natv2AddressMapExternalRealm       SnmpAdminString,
        natv2AddressMapExternalAddressType InetAddressType,
        natv2AddressMapExternalAddress     InetAddress,
        natv2AddressMapSubscriberIndex     Natv2SubscriberIndexOrZero
    }

Now some example numbers:

natv2AddressMapInstanceIndex       = 1
natv2AddressMapInternalRealm       = "DS-Lite Group 5"
natv2AddressMapInternalAddressType = ipv6(2)
natv2AddressMapInternalAddress     = 2001:db8:0:1::1
natv2AddressMapExternalRealm       = "global4"
natv2AddressMapExternalAddressType = ipv4(1)
natv2AddressMapExternalAddress     = 192.0.2.1
natv2AddressMapSubscriberIndex     = 487231

This entry would be indexed by the combination of

{ 1, "DS-Lite Group 5", ipv6(2), 2001:db8:0:1::1 }

Tom



On 27/11/2014 2:11 PM, Simon Perreault wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Tom Taylor <[email protected]>
wrote:

In the first place, you replace the IPv4 --> IPv4 mapping with
{IPv6, IPv4} --> IPv4 mapping. See Section 5.6 of RFC 6333.


I understand that, but I don't see how the proposed MIB text does that.

Beyond that, the text I gave refers to a single mapping in the address map
table. For different external IPv4 external addresses, you would be looking
at different mapping instances.


Can you please give an example with numbers showing how a DS-Lite address
mapping would be represented in the MIB?

Thanks,
Simon


_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to