Updating old thread... I finished the Shepherd write up and requested publication a few days ago.
Sorry for the delay. W On Thursday, November 20, 2014, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Juergen, > > The coman documents were not on the agenda of the OPSAWG meeting in > Honolulu. My understanding is that the first one is on Benoit's table for > review, soon to be followed by the second one (pending Warren's shepherd > write-up and submission). > > Regards, > > Dan > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;>] On Behalf > Of Juergen > > Schoenwaelder > > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 5:01 PM > > To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > > Subject: [OPSAWG] document status > > > > Hi, > > > > since I could not follow the meeting in Honolulu, can I please get a > > clarification where we are with these WG documents? > > > > - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-coman-probstate-reqs-03 > > > > This I-D was apparently sent to the IESG on 2014-10-30. So the token > > is with Benoit and I understand that Warren is the document shepherd. > > > > - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-coman-use-cases-03 > > > > This I-D is still a WG document. What are the next steps and who > > holds the token? Who is going to be the document shepherd? > > > > - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib-02 > > > > This I-D is still a WG document. What are the next steps and who > > holds the token? Who is going to be the document shepherd? > > > > I just want to make sure it is clear who has to take the next action so > that we > > can wrap up things in a timely manner. > > > > /js > > > > -- > > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany > > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OPSAWG mailing list > > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:;> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
