On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 07:51:16AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Juergen, > > On 08/01/2015 20:26, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:13:10PM +0000, Chris Grundemann wrote: > >> On 1/7/15, 3:52 PM, "Juergen Schoenwaelder" > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > >>> My recommendation would be to change the title to be more specific > >>> that this document is a survey report and then to submit this document > >>> as an individual submission to the RFC editor for publication... > ... > > ... My preference still is to publish the survey > > via the individual stream... > > Please can you clarify whether your proposal is that the draft should > be handled as an individual non-WG IETF Stream document sponsored > by an AD, or as an Independent Stream submission to the RFC Editor. > Comparing your two statements above, I don't know which you mean. >
I have not thought much about it but I perhaps an Independent Stream submission is most appropriate. It actually remains somewhat unclear to me _who_ conducted the survey (that is which organization was doing the work) and what the precise involvement of the Internet Society was. (Perhaps the Internet Society did this itself, but I just can't tell from reading the document.) There is also not much information (or I did not find it) about the methodology, i.e., how operators were selected / approached and the questionaire itself. But that does not matter for the question how to publish the result. If my understanding is correct that the IETF was not directly involved in this survey, I assume an Independent Stream submission may be a reasonable approach. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
