[ -DHC to cut down on their clutter ] On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 27, 2015, at 10:20 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: >> In addition, not *everything* is wireless - when I go to a hotel the >> first thing I look for is the wired jack, because hotel wifi is often >> less than brilliant. > > Good point. > > One thing I will say about this BTW is that you should treat DHCPv4 and > DHCPv6 as distinct protocols, because the option formats are different, and I > think it's potentially confusing to lump them together. And mentioning > DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 separately ensures that people won't think this is an > IPv6-only proposal. >
Good point, done, thanks. Posted a new version! W -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
