On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Martin Stiemerling <[email protected]> wrote: > Martin Stiemerling has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-opsawg-coman-use-cases-04: No Objection
[ SNIP ] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The write-up says something about additional reviews. Does this include > reviews by an outside party of the IETF that, for instance, an entity > that operates building automation systems? > Apologies, I (doc shepherd) was unclear - the additional reviews was Thomas and Pascal asking participants in 6TiSCH and 6lo (IPv6 over Networks of Resource-constrained Nodes) to review. -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
