Hi all,

We've submitted a draft about CAPWAP for supporting multi-provider scenario.
Your comments are appreciated. 

Regards,
Jianjie

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
发送时间: 2015年2月26日 11:58
收件人: Songhaibin (A); Youjianjie; Songhaibin (A); Rong Zhang; Rong Zhang; 
Youjianjie
主题: New Version Notification for 
draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp-00.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Jianjie You and posted to the IETF 
repository.

Name:           draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp
Revision:       00
Title:          CAPWAP Control and Data Channel Separation for Multi-provider 
Scenario
Document date:  2015-02-25
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          7
URL:            
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp-00.txt
Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp/
Htmlized:       
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp-00


Abstract:
   The CAPWAP control channel and data channel split architecture has
   some benefits, such as relieving the capacity pressure of the AC,
   which has been discussed in [I-D.ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel] and
   [I-D.xue-opsawg-capwap-separation-capability].  However, only single-
   provider scenario is considered so far.  This document discusses the
   third-party WLAN service provider scenario (i.e.  multi-provider),
   and proposes to extend CAPWAP for supporting this use case.


                                                                                
  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission 
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to