Thank you I'll correct and republish. Admittedly I rushed a bit to make the submission deadline.
Ed > On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:05 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:35:51PM +0000, Mallette, Edwin J. wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> I wanted to make you all aware of a individual draft that is intended to be >> an update to RFC4639 – Cable Device Management Information Base for >> Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) Compliant Cable >> Modems and Cable Modem Termination Systems. >> >> As the original RFC is quite old, this draft is intended to provide an >> update to include the following: >> (1) updates to existing objects >> (2) updates to the compliance language WRT IPv4/IPv6 >> (3) alignment with additional CableLabs specifications that leverage the >> same MIB. >> >> I would appreciate any feedback and I intend (given a timeslot is made >> available) to talk about my draft in Dallas. > > I tried to run smidiff to see what changes have been made (and whether > they are unproblematic wrt. SMIv2 update rules) but then it turned out > that the proposed new MIB module has a number of syntax errors and I > kind of gave up after fixing about five of them. Also the page header > saying RFC 4639 and December 2006 can be confusing if you look at both > versions in your editor. ;-) > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
