Hi, This document supports the WTP establishes data tunnels with different Access Routers (ARs), which may belong to different Virtual Network Operators (VNOs). The slides are available: https://tools.ietf.org/agenda/92/slides/slides-92-opsawg-4.pdf Your questions and comments are appreciated.
Thanks, Jianjie > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Warren Kumari > 发送时间: 2015年4月11日 1:09 > 收件人: [email protected] > 主题: [OPSAWG] Another CAPWAP document > > Hi all, > > Please take a look at "CAPWAP Control and Data Channel Separation for > Multi-provider Scenario" > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp-00) > > This document was discussed somewhat at the face to face meeting in Dallas. > We have discussed this document with our ADs and have decided that it is > sufficiently different to the CAPWAP ALT Tunnel (which is with the IESG), and > that ALT Tunnel is sufficiently fgar in the process that we will keep this > document separate... > > So, please take a look at it, and provide initial feedback We will consider > having > a call for adoption if there is enough evidence of interest.... > > W > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in > the > first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret > at > having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. > ---maf > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
