Dear Hirochita Asai, Thank you for your response and for addressing the comments in my review.
Most of the proposals you made are fully addressing my comments. A couple of open issues are left. See below. Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Hirochika Asai [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 1:00 PM > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] OPS-DIR review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib-02 > > Dear Dan, > > > > 11. Page 20-21: Why is the VirtualMachineStorageType limited to two > media types only? Would not an IANA-administered TC be more appropriate > here? > Although few people are using, the type of floppy disk was missing. Then we > added it. > As for the IANA-administrated TC, if I understand correctly, StorageType in > SNMPv2-TC defines the storage types. However, they are not what we > expect as the media types of virtual storages attached to a virtual machine. > Two issues here: - maybe VirtualMachineStorageMediaType is a better name for the TC? - my suggestion to make the TC IANA-administered would allow for new media types to be added in the future without the need to modify the core MIB module. Hopefully, this MIB module will be used many years ahead and you cannot predict in advance what new media types will be invented or become popular in the future. > > 12. Page 24: It is not clear to me what is an ‘administered region’ > mentioned in the DESCRIPTION clause of the vmUUID object > We would like to mean an “administrative domain”. Does this make sense? > Yes. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
