On Wed, 3 Jun 2015, Bill Fenner wrote: > I'm fine with changing section 7 to something that would remain (I wrote it > that way because I thought that we would have a companion document for the > reclassification, but I realized later that procedure is to be used when > you *don't* have another document to use). However, are you sure it'd be > useful for this document to be referred to in the RFC index for the > historic RFCs? It seems like it'd just add a level of indirection, since > this document says "go see the other RFC4xxx documents".
I think it would be useful, since it would allow the metadata to say or imply "go see RFCxxxx for the current version of these MIB modules." //cmh _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
