Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I mean the following as a question, because it's something I've never
thought about, but seems odd: Is it normal to have 2119 language in the
description fields in a MIB definition? Who is that language intended
for?

-- 6.1, vm-mib "description" field:

Do you expect the sentence about 'yyy' being temporary to be removed by
the RFC Editor? If so, you probably want a note to that effect.

-- VirtualMachineList description: "... set of eight virtual machine
vmIndex..."

Should vmIndex be plural?

-- 8, 1st paragraph:

"noticeable number of notifications"

Is "noticeable" the word you intended? It seems like any number of
notifications might be noticeable--that's the point of notifications.
Also, this sentence seems out of place (the next sentence seams to draw a
conclusion from the sentence prior to this one.)

"... It is recommended that attention be given to these objects ...

I'm not sure what it means to give attention to the objects. Identifying
who or what needs to give attention might help. (consider  active voice)

-- paragraph 5: "It is recommended that the implementers consider the
security
   features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework."

Do you mean "use the ... features" or "consider using the ... features"?


_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to