Hi, Warren I can commit to editing and contributing to the document.
Best Regards Zongpeng Du -----Original Message----- [OPSAWG] 答复: Call for Adoption: draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp Youjianjie <[email protected]> Sat, 27 June 2015 01:45 UTCShow header<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=opsawg> Support as a co-author. I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, Jianjie > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Warren Kumari [mailto:[email protected]] > 发送时间: 2015年6月25日 21:05 > 收件人: [email protected]; > [email protected] > 主题: Call for Adoption: draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp > > Dear OpsAWG WG, > > The authors of draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp have asked for this > draft to be considered for OpsAWG adoption. It was presented and discussed > somewhat at IETF91 in Dallas - there was a question raised about similarities > / > overlap with draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel (which lies with the IESG). > After some discussions we have decided that these documents complement > each other, and so ask the WG to consider > draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp for adoption. > > We would like 4-5 people to commit to editing and contributing to the > document, and a similar number to commit to reviewing it. > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by > OpsAWG, > and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > This call for adoption ends Thu 09-Jul-2015. > > In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with Intellectual > Property Rights (IPR)"): > If you are personally aware of any IPR that applies to > draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp, has this IPR been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and > 5378 for more details.) > > > Thanks, > Warren Kumari > (as OpsAWG WG co-chair) > > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in > the > first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret > at > having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. > ---maf
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
