> On Nov 16, 2015, at 04:27 , Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Important document indeed.
>
> I have a comment on section 7.1 where "ip" as a protocol (the double
> quotes are from the I-D) is mentioned but does it mean IPv4 or IPv6 or
> both?
Surely one would hope that it’s meaning is contextual to the time of reading
and that today it would mean {IPv4, IPv6} and that sometime in the future,
it will likely mean {IPv6} and beyond that come to mean {IPv6,…}.
>
> In the same section, may I suggest to describe the syntax of the 'addr'
> field?
Wouldn’t the syntax of the addr field be inherently dependent on the
RFC defining the IP version in question in the previous context?
Owen
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
