People seem to be beginning to get on the "SHA-1 is dead" bandwagon, and
are increasingly moving along the "Whoa, MD5, that's *so* 2010" -- so,
yeah, I'd agree with Randy on the "next year or three".
W

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 9:35 PM Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote:

> > We use SHA and AES with snmp v3. Given the general pressue other parts
> > of the business to carefully track and generally improve which crypto
> > suites are used we would probably move there if the hardware supported
> > it (I don't think getting it done in the NMS would really be that
> > hard).
>
> not a hot button, but on the gonna-have-to-do-in-the-next-year-or-three
> list.
>
> randy
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to