On 2016-02-09 00:50, Warren Kumari wrote:


On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 10:50 PM Loa Andersson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Warren,



    On 2016-02-08 04:18, Warren Kumari wrote:
     >
     >
     > On Friday, February 5, 2016, Zhoutianran <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
     > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
    wrote:
     >
     >     Oh, really? I would like to know.
     >
     >
     > Bribery with cookies usually works well, for really big things,
    bribery
     > with a funny hat...

    do I read this right if I understand it like this

    - small things I give one or more cookies


Yes.

    - big big things, I wear a funny hat when I give you the cookies
    right?


No no no no no no no...
You *bring* me a funny hat - for example, Jim Martin and I found this
one in Amsterdam: https://twitter.com/danyork/status/623142046031720449
The bigger the ask, the sillier the hat needs to be.

Damm it! I never get to wear the funny hat!

/Loa

W
P.S: Yes, I *did* just use "ask" as a noun. I wanted to try it, and it
was oddly thrilling....


    /Loa

    PS
    Remember that we have runnig cookie code, ask ekr :)
     >
     > W
     >
     >     Could you please send a private message to me :-)
     >
     >     Happy the new monkey year to all you guys!
     >
     >     Best,
     >     Tianran
     >
     >      > -----Original Message-----
     >      > From: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]> <javascript:;>] On
     >     Behalf Of Tim Wicinski
     >      > Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 8:51 AM
     >      > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <javascript:;>
     >      > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Please welcome our new chair!
     >      >
     >      >
     >      > Welcome Zhou!
     >      >
     >      > If you need any help managing Warren, just speak up. Many
    of us
     >     are quite
     >      > skilled at this.
     >      >
     >      > tim
     >      >
     >      >
     >      > On 2/2/16 2:19 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
     >      > > Greetings,
     >      > >
     >      > > First, I want to thank everyone who volunteered. The
    enthusiasm and
     >      > > depth of field present in the pool of volunteers who
    indicated
     >      > > interest in serving as co-chair is truly humbling. I
    talked to
     >     several
     >      > > of you over the course of this deliberation in addition
    to my co-ad
     >      > > and the present chairs. My expectation is we will have
    three chairs
     >      > > until Scott steps down following IETF 95.
     >      > >
     >      > > On to Business.
     >      > >
     >      > > Zhou Tianran has agreed to  take on the role of opsawg
    chair.
     >     He joins
     >      > > Warren Kumari and Scott Bradner in this role. He has
    experience
     >     in the
     >      > > IETF as a contributor and in ONF and BBF as well as the
     >     OpenDaylight,
     >      > > OPNFV, OpenStack communities. I welcome the experience
    the he will
     >      > > bring with SDN and NETCONF/YANG to the opsawg chair role, I
     >     think we
     >      > > will be well served in addressing that part of our
    constituency.
     >      > >
     >      > > Thanks
     >      > > joel
     >      > >
     >      > >
     >      > >
     >      > > _______________________________________________
     >      > > OPSAWG mailing list
     >      > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <javascript:;>
     >      > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
     >      > >
     >      >
     >      > _______________________________________________
     >      > OPSAWG mailing list
     >      > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <javascript:;>
     >      > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
     >
     >     _______________________________________________
     >     OPSAWG mailing list
     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <javascript:;>
     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
     >
     >
     >
     > --
     > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a
    bad idea
     > in the first place.
     > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later
    expressing
     > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that
    pair of
     > pants.
     >     ---maf
     >
     >
     > _______________________________________________
     > OPSAWG mailing list
     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
     >


_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to