Hi All, I have revised the minute according to Dan’s information. And it seems no other change on the minute. https://tools.ietf.org/wg/opsawg/minutes
Regards, Tianran From: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan) Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 5:29 AM To: Warren Kumari; [email protected] Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Minutes posted. Hi, On the Automatic Attachment section: OLD: Dan: Can be applicable to other types of tunnels. Not asking for new protocol. Providing a report. Shahram: There seems to be a mix of requirements, discussion, other in doc. Dan: Yes. It needs to be cleaned up. Diego Lopez commented. NEW: Dan: Can be applicable to other types of tunnels. Not asking for new protocol. Describing solution to an operational problem. Shahram: There seems to be a mix of requirements, discussion, other in doc. Dan: Yes. It needs to be cleaned up. Plan to split documents in separate I-Ds. Diego Lopez expressed interest and commented. Regards, Dan From: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Warren Kumari Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 12:08 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [OPSAWG] Minutes posted. Hi all, Thanks to Barbara for taking minutes. Draft minutes have been posted, please let the chairs know if anything you say was misrepresented. W
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
