He? The fix aligns the textual description with the actual definition.
What is your proposal? Keep them inconsistent? I am puzzled now as
well.

/js

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 07:15:03PM -0700, Randy Presuhn wrote:
> Hi -
> 
> I am puzzled that this change was permitted.
> It seems to be in clear violation of the
> constraints imposed by RFC 2579 section 5.
> Once the textual convention has been published,
> such a change, even if it is a "fix", is not
> allowed by the interoperability rules.
> 
> Randy
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: RFC Errata System <[email protected]>
> >Sent: Jun 17, 2016 12:44 AM
> >To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], 
> >[email protected], [email protected], 
> >[email protected]
> >Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
> >Subject: [OPSAWG] [Errata Verified] RFC7666 (4710)
> >
> >The following errata report has been verified for RFC7666,
> >"Management Information Base for Virtual Machines Controlled by a 
> >Hypervisor". 
> >
> >--------------------------------------
> >You may review the report below and at:
> >http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7666&eid=4710
> >
> >--------------------------------------
> >Status: Verified
> >Type: Editorial
> >
> >Reported by: jean-marie Kubek <[email protected]>
> >Date Reported: 2016-06-15
> >Verified by: Benoit Claise (IESG)
> >
> >Section: 6.2 IANA MIB
> >
> >Original Text
> >-------------
> >IANAStorageMediaType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
> >       STATUS       current
> >       DESCRIPTION
> >               "The media type of a storage device:
> >
> >               unknown(1)     The media type is unknown, e.g., because
> >                              the implementation failed to obtain the
> >                              media type from the hypervisor.
> >
> >               other(2)       The media type is other than those
> >                              defined in this conversion.
> >
> >Corrected Text
> >--------------
> >IANAStorageMediaType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
> >       STATUS       current
> >       DESCRIPTION
> >               "The media type of a storage device:
> >
> >                 other(1)       The media type is other than those
> >                                defined in this conversion.
> >
> >                 unknown(2)     The media type is unknown, e.g., because
> >                                the implementation failed to obtain the
> >                                media type from the hypervisor.
> >
> >
> >Notes
> >-----
> >Inversion of other and unknown integer values in the description of the 
> >IANAStorageMediaType TEXTUAL-CONVENTION.
> >
> >FIrst referenced at IANA  RT as [IANA #913286] Incoherency in 
> >IANA-STORAGE-MEDIA-TYPE-MIB
> >
> >--------------------------------------
> >RFC7666 (draft-ietf-opsawg-vmm-mib-04)
> >--------------------------------------
> >Title               : Management Information Base for Virtual Machines 
> >Controlled by a Hypervisor
> >Publication Date    : October 2015
> >Author(s)           : H. Asai, M. MacFaden, J. Schoenwaelder, K. Shima, T. 
> >Tsou
> >Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> >Source              : Operations and Management Area Working Group
> >Area                : Operations and Management
> >Stream              : IETF
> >Verifying Party     : IESG
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >OPSAWG mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
> 

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to