Exactly, this was what I stressed in the today’s meeting, to clarify the 
difference between the model which is used between customer and service 
orchestrator and the model used between OSS/BSS and network orchestrator.
Even the model used between customer and service orchestrator and the model 
used between service orchestrator and network orchestrator doesn’t need to be 
same.

-Qin
发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Adrian Farrel
发送时间: 2016年7月19日 16:41
收件人: '[email protected]'
主题: [OPSAWG] BTW draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained now at rev -01

We only made a small change, but one thing we did was try to highlight a 
distinction between the model on the interface between customer and operator (a 
la L3SM) and the model on the interface between OSS/BSS/etc. and network 
orchestrator (which is what we see as YANG models in BESS, for example).

Have a look at Figure 3.

Adrian

From: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: 19 July 2016 09:28
To: 'Benoit Claise'; 'Qin Wu'; '[email protected]'
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for 
draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained-00.txt

Benoit,

I think that you mean to say "is *an* objective of". That is, the draft you 
point at has a far wider scope and purpose.

No problem with that.

Doing our work in L3SM we repeatedly encountered confusion about what a service 
model is and where it fits in the "hierarchy". So we wrote some text.

Looking at our draft and Figure 1 in the yang-model-classification there is not 
complete coherence.

Which way would like to go forward?
Roll our text into yang-model-classification?
Push forward separately?

Adrian

From: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise
Sent: 19 July 2016 09:18
To: Qin Wu; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] New Version Notification for 
draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained-00.txt

Qin,

Explaining the difference between a service and network element YANG modules is 
the objective of 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification/

Abstract



   The YANG [RFC6020] data modeling language is currently being

   considered for a wide variety of applications throughout the

   networking industry at large.  Many standards-defining organizations

   (SDOs), open source software projects, vendors and users are using

   YANG to develop and publish YANG modules of configuration, state data

   and operations for a wide variety of applications.  At the same time,

   there is currently no well-known terminology to categorize various

   types of YANG modules.



   A consistent terminology would help with the categorization of YANG

   modules, assist in the analysis the YANG data modeling efforts in the

   IETF and other organizations, and bring clarity to the YANG-related

   discussions between the different groups.



   This document describes a set of concepts and associated terms to

   support consistent classification of YANG modules.
Regards, Benoit

Hi,

We have submitted a new I-D that discusses the scope and purpose of service 
models within

the IETF and describes how a service model can be used by a network

operator.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained/



In addition, this draft clarifies the role and position of service model in the 
SDN architecture and

Clear several misconception on the service model.



Your questions and comments are welcome.



Regards!

-Qin

-----邮件原件-----

发件人: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]]

发送时间: 2016年7月5日 19:55

收件人: Liushucheng (Will); Adrian Farrel; Liushucheng (Will); Qin Wu

主题: New Version Notification for draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained-00.txt





A new version of I-D, draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained-00.txt

has been successfully submitted by Qin Wu and posted to the IETF repository.



Name:          draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained

Revision:      00

Title:         Service Models Explained

Document date: 2016-07-05

Group:         Individual Submission

Pages:         12

URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained-00.txt

Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained/

Htmlized:       
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained-00





Abstract:

   The IETF has produced a considerable number of data models in the

   YANG modelling language.  The majority of these are used to model

   devices and they allow access for configuration and to read

   operational status.



   A small number of YANG models are used to model services (for

   example, the Layer Three Virtual Private Network Service Model

   produced by the L3SM working group).



   This document briefly sets out the scope of and purpose of an IETF

   service model, and it shows where a service model might fit into a

   Software Defined Networking architecture or deployment.









Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission 
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.



The IETF Secretariat



_______________________________________________

OPSAWG mailing list

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to