Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice 发件人： PJ Aitken 收件人： 周天然; ip...@ietf.org; 抄送： draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.auth...@ietf.org; 主题： Re: [IPFIX] FW: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 时间： 2017-02-13 20:41:17
Per section 6 of RFC7012, new IPFIX Information Elements can be added by direct application to IANA; there's no need for a draft or RFC. However, the introduction and examples may be valuable, especially for BGP experts who are less familiar with IPFIX. I've no objection to adopting the draft. P. On 13/02/17 03:49, Tianran Zhou wrote: > Dear IPFIX, > > Since the IPFIX WG is concluded, this IE extension draft is processed now in > OPSAWG. > Thanks very much for the previous comments and discussions on this draft in > this mailing list. > Now the OPSAWG is polling for adoption of this I-D. I sincerely appreciate > your opinion and review. > > Best Regards, > Tianran Zhou > > -----Original Message----- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:37 AM > To: opsawg@ietf.org > Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org > Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 > > Dear OPSAWG, > > In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE > extension draft. > By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would > like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should > be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG. > > Export BGP community information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dli-2Dopsawg-2Dipfix-2Dbgp-2Dcommunity-2D02&d=DwICAg&c=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=Xx9729xYDYoCgBDdcp1FKt5PyYd1TCoXNKhyPY8CFp8&m=e8U_gPwC_H2I5yK7XMm7IZ29PU1rg0wNbPsJvDG6RDI&s=xYsTrrFuD2dlfxdp0X3pcPMw4vuozglfpGLv4A5TKNw&e= > > The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by Feb > 27. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement > or deploy the extension described in the document. > > Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our > IETF97 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or > have serious objections (with explanation of course). > > Regards, > Tianran > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_opsawg&d=DwICAg&c=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=Xx9729xYDYoCgBDdcp1FKt5PyYd1TCoXNKhyPY8CFp8&m=e8U_gPwC_H2I5yK7XMm7IZ29PU1rg0wNbPsJvDG6RDI&s=lUyPAeQ2BUnIuqL4qUS1w45CNe3JixjYQzYQVN4Y3q4&e= > > _______________________________________________ > IPFIX mailing list > ip...@ietf.org > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_ipfix&d=DwICAg&c=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=Xx9729xYDYoCgBDdcp1FKt5PyYd1TCoXNKhyPY8CFp8&m=e8U_gPwC_H2I5yK7XMm7IZ29PU1rg0wNbPsJvDG6RDI&s=lOUrCUQVhsdnIWvSTJycjdy-0V6yZZ9NvjU2N-wZn18&e=
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
