I tried compiling the YANG model. I had to make the following corrections:

  /* augment "/acl:access-lists/acl:acl/acl:aces/acl:ace/acl:matches" */
     augment
"/acl:access-lists/acl:acl/acl:access-list-entries/acl:ace/acl:matches"


 /*augment
"/acl:access-lists/acl:acl/acl:aces/acl:ace/acl:matches/acl:tcp-acl" */
     augment
"/acl:access-lists/acl:acl/acl:access-list-entries/acl:ace/acl:matches/acl:tcp-acl"


I am basing this on [email protected], which I
believe to be the latest draft of the ietf-access-control-list

Perhaps I am mistaken (in which case please correct me).

Thanks,

Ranga



On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This update addresses both of Benoit's issues:
>
>    - The dates on the YANG files are now consistent.
>    - There is a statement of conformance as to which features are
>    expected to be implemented.
>    - One or two small editorials.
>
> Note that the draft DOES produce a yanglint warning which is expected.
> This is because yanglint does not know what to expect in terms of what
> features are implemented in the ACL model.  Thus the above statement.
>
> Eliot
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: Eliot Lear <[email protected]>, Ralph Droms <[email protected]>, Dan
> Romascanu <[email protected]>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 03:27:48 -0700
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-10.txt
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-10.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Eliot Lear and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name:           draft-ietf-opsawg-mud
> Revision:       10
> Title:          Manufacturer Usage Description Specification
> Document date:  2017-09-15
> Group:          opsawg
> Pages:          53
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-
> drafts/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-10.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-10
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-
> mud-10
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-10
>
> Abstract:
>    This memo specifies a component-based architecture for manufacturer
>    usage descriptions (MUD).  The goal of MUD is to provide a means for
>    Things to signal to the network what sort of access and network
>    functionality they require to properly function.  The initial focus
>    is on access control.  Later work can delve into other aspects.
>
>    This memo specifies two YANG modules, IPv4 and IPv6 DHCP options, an
>    LLDP TLV, a URL suffix specification, an X.509 certificate extension
>    and a means to sign and verify the descriptions.
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>
>


-- 
M. Ranganathan
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to