Hi WG, This call is concluded without objection on the revision. Let's move forward to IESG.
Thanks, Tianran > -----Original Message----- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 2:05 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [OPSAWG] WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10 > > Dear OPSAWG, > > The following draft was sent to IESG, but received some critical comments. > > Alternate Tunnel Encapsulation for Data Frames in CAPWAP > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-10 > > Now the authors have addressed all the comments, and received confirmation > from the Security DIR reviewer. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel- > 09-secdir-early-meadows-2017-08-10/ > > This is a notice to start a two-week OPSAWG WG last call review for the > document. > Please read the above draft and send any issues, comments, or corrections > to this mailing list. > Please indicate your support or concerns by Wednesday Oct 4, 2017. > > Please note that the authors decided to change the document type to > Experimental, as stated below: > 1.3. History of the document > This document was started to accommodate Service Provider's need of a > more flexible deployment mode with alternative tunnels [RFC7494]. > Experiments and tests have been done for this alt-tunnel network > infrastructure. However important, the deployment of relevant > technology is yet to complete. This experimental document is > intended to serve as a historical reference for any future work as to > the operational and deployment requirements. > > Thanks, > Tianran, as co-chair > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
