On 31.01.18 21:35, M. Ranganathan wrote: > The ACL draft has various operators for ports, including eq, lte, gte > > Does a compliant MUD implementation have to support all of these > operators? If ONLY eq is required to be supported (I hope ) , can this > be stated in the draft.
All. The MUD file augments the acl-model. We are not varying off the model in this aspect, nor do we really have a good way to do so.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
