Hi Tim,
I raised the question in my ops-dir review on whether it was OK for a Standards
Track document (draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang) to include definitions for an
Experimental Track mechanism (NPT66).
I don't personally have a strong view either way, but felt obliged to point out
the discrepancy
And you can be sure that this is much appreciated. Thanks for your feedback.
Regards, Benoit
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg