Hi Tim,
I raised the question in my ops-dir review on whether it was OK for a Standards 
Track document (draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang) to include definitions for an 
Experimental Track mechanism (NPT66).

I don't personally have a strong view either way, but felt obliged to point out 
the discrepancy
And you can be sure that this is much appreciated. Thanks for your feedback.

Regards, Benoit

OPSAWG mailing list

Reply via email to