Hi Scott,

Thanks for your review.  Please see below.

On 10.04.18 15:03, Scott Bradner wrote:
> Reviewer: Scott Bradner
> Review result: Has Nits
> I did an OPS-DIR review of Manufacturer Usage Description Specification <
> draft-ietf-opsawg-mud > The specification is well written and clear (I also
> agree with Robert Spark's nits).
> One suggestion about document organization: I would either move the discussion
> of what should be done if the MUD controller can not retrieve the MUD file for
> some reason or another out of the security considerations section to after
> section 1.9 or at least include a forward pointer to the discussion.

I think this is a good point.  Section 1.6 ok with you?


OPSAWG mailing list

Reply via email to