wfm

thanks

Scott

> On Apr 10, 2018, at 10:11 AM, Eliot Lear <l...@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Scott,
> 
> Thanks for your review.  Please see below.
> 
> 
> On 10.04.18 15:03, Scott Bradner wrote:
>> Reviewer: Scott Bradner
>> Review result: Has Nits
>> 
>> I did an OPS-DIR review of Manufacturer Usage Description Specification <
>> draft-ietf-opsawg-mud > The specification is well written and clear (I also
>> agree with Robert Spark's nits).
>> 
>> One suggestion about document organization: I would either move the 
>> discussion
>> of what should be done if the MUD controller can not retrieve the MUD file 
>> for
>> some reason or another out of the security considerations section to after
>> section 1.9 or at least include a forward pointer to the discussion.
>> 
> 
> I think this is a good point.  Section 1.6 ok with you?
> 
> Eliot
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to