On 10/07/2018 01:58, Alan DeKok wrote:
On Jul 9, 2018, at 5:51 PM, Andrej Ota <[email protected]> wrote:
Is it worth asking everyone or even expecting anyone to migrate to
new-improved-and-still-insecure revision of T+ that requires exactly same
amount of operational solutions to secure deployment?
Is anyone asking for that?
No?
Then why bring it up? It's a straw man.
This was my understanding of the statement: "I think that the security
considerations section *should* invalidate insecure implementations."
Andrej.
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
