On 10/22/18 17:35, Haoyu song wrote: > Thanks Joe. 10 to 15 minutes each will be enough. I'll be the presenter. > > As for the NTF draft, I don't recall there was general concern in 102 that > this work may not be relevant to the IETF. If anybody think so, please be > specific why. We have talked about the motivation in the draft and wish we > can provide something useful to IETF, so we are open to hear any comments and > opinions. Thanks!
I went back in the minutes as I may have been mixing some work. What I remember from my earlier reads is that the work focused more on a catalog of existing OSS projects. I was unsure what the ask of the IETF was in terms of what additional/new work needed to be done. Others commented that a detailed comparison and evaluation is required in order to determine what the right approach/recommendation should be. That said, I have not had a chance to read the latest text. I'll go through it and offer more current comments. Joe > > Haoyu > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Clarke [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 2:20 PM > To: Haoyu song <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Request for presentation slots in IETF103 > > On 10/22/18 16:42, Haoyu song wrote: >> Dear OPSAWG chairs, >> >> >> >> I'm writing to request two presentation slots to cover the following >> two >> drafts: >> >> >> >> 1. Newly submitted: In-situ Flow Information Telemetry Framework >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework/ >> >> Abstract: In-situ Flow Information Telemetry (iFIT) is a framework >> for applying >> >> techniques such as In-situ OAM (iOAM) and Postcard-Based Telemetry >> >> (PBT) in networks. It enumerates several key components and >> >> describes how these components can be assembled to achieve a >> complete >> >> working solution for user traffic telemetry in carrier networks. >> >> >> >> 2. New version: Network Telemetry Framework >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-ntf/ >> >> >> >> We'll address the comments and suggestions from reviewers and >> presentation we made >> >> in this latest version. >> >> >> >> Thank you very much for considerations! > > Good news. The ADs have granted us some of the Ops Area time. Given that, > we can add timeslots for your drafts. How much time will you need (max 15 > minutes per draft)? Who will present? Will the presenter be in BKK? > > Remember, we're looking for presentations that focus on open issues and > questions for the WG. Do not walk through the draft. Pre-seed the WG with > questions so that people can come prepared to contribute. > > Specifically with NTF, there has been some comments on list of late (which is > good), but there was general concern in 102 that this work may not be > relevant to the IETF. I would appreciate you addressing the relevance > question. > > Thanks. > > Joe > > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
