Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-11: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- One comment on section 1: "For example, they can shift some flows from congested links to low utilized links through an SDN controller or PCE [RFC4655]." I'm not aware that ipfix information is commonly used for dynamic traffic adaptation and I'm not sure that is recommendable. Can you maybe choose a different example. E.g use of IPFIX for troubleshooting or more generally network monitoring? Thanks! _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
