Although I haven’t been following this work closely, I believe MUD has some very interesting use cases, and I hope that work continues. I agree with Eliot that a working group must have a critical mass of people willing to do the work, not just show up at the meetings. I also think that once there are more than two or three drafts, on a topic we should move it out of OPSAWG, so MUD is a good candidate for a new WG.
-Qin 发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Ted Lemon 发送时间: 2019年7月31日 18:15 收件人: Eliot Lear <[email protected]> 抄送: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 主题: Re: [OPSAWG] [Mud] The future of MUD work On Jul 31, 2019, at 4:45 AM, Eliot Lear <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On the other hand, it shouldn’t just be me. It’d be a very small working group ;-) If others are interested, they should speak up. I don’t think I would necessarily initiate work, but I suspect if there were a MUD WG I would show up for it and review documents. The fact that MUD is in OPSAWG has meant that I don’t go because that’s not a WG I normally go to, and I didn’t realize that was where the MUD work was happening.
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
