As an author, I support this adoption.

For TE and service mapping, I agree with Dhruv that we need to converge with 
draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang.

Best,
Alejandro



El 11/10/19 12:22, "OPSAWG en nombre de Dhruv Dhody" <[email protected] 
en nombre de [email protected]> escribió:

    Support for adopting this work.
    
    On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:32 PM li zhenqiang <[email protected]> 
wrote:
    >
    >
    > Support adopting this doc as an operator with the following comments.
    >
    > We are considering corelating VPN services with tunnels (SR MPLS TE 
tunnels or SRv6 TE tunnels) and SR policies to provide specific SLA  to our VPN 
coustomers. So please consider to add those augmentations in the VPN service. 
And I'd like to complete this work if we all determine those are necessary.
    >
    
    See draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang which does the mapping for
    L3SM. Would be good to think how the grouping can be applied to L3NM
    as well.
    
    Thanks!
    Dhruv
    
    
    > Best Regards,
    > Zhenqiang Li
    > ________________________________
    > [email protected]
    >
    >
    > From: Tianran Zhou
    > Date: 2019-09-29 14:28
    > To: [email protected]
    > Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption call for draft-aguado-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-02
    > Hi WG,
    >
    > This email starts a 2 weeks working group adoption call for 
draft-aguado-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-02.
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-aguado-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm/
    >
    > This document proposes a L3VPN Network Yang Model (L3NM) to facilitate 
communication between a service orchestrator and a network 
controller/orchestrator.
    >
    > If you support adopting this document please say so, and please give an 
indication of why you think it is important. Also please say if you will be 
willing to review and help the draft.
    > If you do not support adopting this document as a starting point for work 
on this topic, please say why.
    > This poll will run until Oct 14.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Tianran and Joe
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > OPSAWG mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > OPSAWG mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
    
    _______________________________________________
    OPSAWG mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
    

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to