> On Oct 28, 2019, at 21:43, Tianran Zhou <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi WG, > > This email starts a 2 weeks working group adoption call for > draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-07. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization/ > This document provides a framework that describes and discusses an > architecture for service and network management automation that takes > advantage of YANG modeling technologies. > > If you support adopting this document please say so, and please give an > indication of why you think it is important. Also please say if you will be > willing to review and help the draft. > If you do not support adopting this document as a starting point for work on > this topic, please say why. > This poll will run until Nov 11.
As an individual, I support adoption. I had some private comments for the authors on the latest revision that I will share here because I think they are critical to the adoption call. I realize some of these may have been corrected in an upcoming rev. * I found some of the text meandering and confusing. The intro, for example, laid out a challenge around telemetry consumption, but this doc doesn’t really address the scale issue. * Section 4.2.3 also crosses from a pure model discussion to something more NETCONF protocol-specific in directly mentioning <operational> (and without reference). I agree operational state is important, but this mention seems out of place. * I’d also like to see your examples go through the entire lifecycle, or at least more so than they do. For example, getting to fault diagnosis would be helpful since Section 4.2.4 doesn’t really give much content there. Joe _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
