Hi WG,

Now we conclude the poll and adopt this document as WG draft.
We collected many interests and supports that can help the document evolution.

Authors,
The chairs think "virtualization" in the draft name is confusing, and suggest 
to rename it as "model-driven-management-automation". What's your thoughts?
Please republish draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-07 as 
draft-ietf-model-driven-management-automation-00 with only the date and file 
name changed. And please use "replace" in the data tracker.

Cheers,
Tianran & Joe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 9:44 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption call for
> draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-07
> 
> Hi WG,
> 
> This email starts a 2 weeks working group adoption call for
> draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-07.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtua
> lization/
> This document provides a framework that describes and discusses an
> architecture for service and network management automation that takes
> advantage of YANG modeling technologies.
> 
> If you support adopting this document please say so, and please give an
> indication of why you think it is important. Also please say if you will be
> willing to review and help the draft.
> If you do not support adopting this document as a starting point for work
> on this topic, please say why.
> This poll will run until Nov 11.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tianran and Joe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to