Regarding the question, on the second to last page of the opsawg-tacacs-yang presentation slides, about the must in model ietf-system, which I believe was whether to add a must for tacacs, remove the must for radius, or do nothing; that must seems wrong to me.
I would expect the system to react no differently to missing sever configuration than to a list of servers that all fail to respond. Some vendors have done this historically in cli. Whether ietf-system should be changed, I do not know it is worth the effort. If the WG agrees that its existence is wrong, that might be another question for yang doctors. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
