On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 05:27:04AM +0000, Tianran Zhou wrote: > Hi WG, > > On IETF 106 meeting, we saw predominant interest and support to this draft, > especially from operators. The authors then resolved all the open issues. > As requested by the authors, this email starts a 2 weeks working group > adoption call for draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-09. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework/ > > If you support adopting this document please say so, and please give an > indication of why you think it is important. Also please say if you will be > willing to review and help the draft. > If you do not support adopting this document as a starting point to work on, > please say why. > This poll will run until Dec 23.
Dear Tianran and others, I support the adoption of this draft and offer myself to review it and contribute to it. I think it is important to separate the concepts from this and NTF but some degree of overlapping would be required to ensure that data plane notifications, such as those coming from external /data/ sources, are well integrated with control plane elements. > Thanks, > Tianran as co-chair Regards, Pedro -- Pedro Martinez-Julia Network Science and Convergence Device Technology Laboratory Network System Research Institute National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT) 4-2-1, Nukui-Kitamachi, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8795, Japan Email: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------- *** Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem *** _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
