From: OPSAWG <[email protected]> on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> Sent: 18 April 2020 22:03
Joe Looking at the YANG module it would appear that a lot of prior knowledge is needed in order to understand it, such as QinQ, dot1Q, GRE, LDP, VRRP, etc etc ie they are what I think of as Normative References and yet I cannot recall seeing a YANG module with so few reference clauses; and the very few reference clauses that are there refer to RFC that do not appear in the I-D References. I also note that the IANA Considerations registers a different prefix to that in the YANG module and it is unclear /*UNUSED*/ is about. And examples in the body of the I-D rather than as an Informative appendix mmmm. I am unenthusiastic about looking any deeper. Tom Petch I’m getting to the virtual interim TODO items, and this was first on my list. I have requested a Yang Doctor review for revision -03 of this draft based on the author’s request that it has reached a state of stability. Joe _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
