I can confirm both the desire to improve the doc, as well as being buried under things.
C ___________________________________________ Colin Doyle Juniper Networks | Senior Systems Engineer C. 503.810.2129 | E. [email protected] On 5/20/20, 11:24 AM, "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <[email protected]> wrote: [External Email. Be cautious of content] > On May 20, 2020, at 11:50, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: >> The shepherd writeup contains this remark, which made me squint a bit: >> "More security review was asked for by the WG at various [times], and >> it is not clear that this input will be taken into account." Why's >> that? > > When I did the review of comments, there were a few comments/threads > in the archives which did not clearly have a followup action/commit/diff. > I am not sure if the WG decided that the comments were not relevant, or if > changes were made but not acknowledged. I don't know if the commenters > are happy with the result, or still waiting for a response. I think at times in the email exchanges, the authors might have been buried under other things. That said, I don’t think they have outright ignored any comments at this point. Either they’ve been addressed, discussed, or are going to be addressed. I have the impression the authors are very keen on taking comments and improving the doc. Joe Juniper Business Use Only _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
