On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 7:03 AM tom petch <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> > Sent: 18 June 2020 18:16 > To: tom petch > Cc: opsawg; [email protected] > Subject: Re: example in tacacs yang was Re: Shepherd review of > draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang > > On Jun 18, 2020, at 12:01, tom petch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > From: OPSAWG <[email protected]> on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke) > > <[email protected]> > > Sent: 28 May 2020 15:52 > > Joe > > Looking at sdi-12 I see that it has added a reference to DHXPv6 in Section 2; > the Introduction has DHCPv6
Gargh! Stupid keyboard with X and C right next to each other :-) Fixed in the github version... Thank you! W > > Tom Petch. > > > > > > > > > > > Looking at the example in tacacs-yang-06 I see it uses an address of > > 10.10..10.x. I think that this should be an address reserved for > > documentation 192.0.2 if I recall. > > Yep, good catch. Authors, can you update to something in 192.0.2.0/24? > Thanks. > > Joe > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
