Thanks, Rob. Maybe it’s just me, but your email is truncated as you can see below. I also didn’t see any attachment.
Joe > On Jul 10, 2020, at 12:52, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Apologies for the delay, but please find my AD review of the TACACS+ YANG > module draft. > > I would like to thank the authors for their work on this document, and the WG > for providing reviews and input in this document. > > I believe that the document is in good shape but propose some minor changes > to some of the wording in places. > > One particular question that I would like to pull to the top is the naming of > the module and identifiers: > These generally use "tacacsplus", but I think that "tacacs-plus" might be > better and more readable. > > > Full comments are inline in the document below (marked as #) > > > The YANG model can be used with network management protocols such as > NETCONF[RFC6241] to install, manipulate, and delete the configuration > of network devices. > > Abstract > > This document defines a YANG module that augment the System > Management data model defined in the RFC 7317 with TACACS+ client > model. The data model of Terminal Access Controller Access Control > System Plus (TACACS+) client allows the configuration of TACACS+ > servers for centralized Authentication, Authorization and Accounting _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
