Hello Joe, On 7/28/20 6:08 PM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote:
Korian, thank you for the presentation in OpsA today. I have to say, this is the first I’ve seen the OSS SAIN Agent, and I like the work. I agree with your assessment that, in general, the quality and quantity of rules is going to be key to success. Even low-hanging fruit rules for things like running processes and interface errors will be helpful. Of course, more complex service assurance rules like buffer availability, FIB integrity, etc. (like you showed with VPP huge pages) will add more value.
thanks!
What changes, if any, did this work do to the SAIN YANG modules?
We had a few discussions with Benoit and Eric, and I believe it lead to a few changes among them: introduction of symptom-history-start, the update on assurance-graph-timestamp, assurance-graph-version and label-change, minor inconsistencies in label/description [1], and the addition of section 3.10 in [2].
[1] https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-claise-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-05
[2] https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-claise-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-03.txt
Korian
Joe
-- Korian Edeline Université de Liège (ULg) Bât. B28 Algorithmique des Grands Systèmes Quartier Polytech 1 Allée de la Découverte 10 4000 Liège Phone: +32 4 366 56 05 _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
